Student Conduct Process
Flow Sheet
| UH WEST O`AHU PLAYERS | AUTHORITY | PROCESSES |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
Complaint Intake/Preliminary Fact Findings:
Report Submitted: A report is submitted & rec’d by the Student Conduct Office.
Report Rec’d: The SCO reviews the report and meets with the Complaint and witness(es), if any, to gather information.
Preliminary Fact Finding: The SCO conducts an impartial and reliable preliminary fact finding investigation to determine if the allegation(s) has merit, no merit, or if it can be resolved administratively. The SCO will meet with the reporter and witness(es), if any, and will determine which of the twenty-three (23) prohibited conduct may have been violated based on the information provided.
The SCO determines if there is sufficient or insufficient information that a policy violation occurred.
No Merit: If the allegations can be resolved administratively the report is resolved and shall be final. If there is insufficient information that a policy violation may have occurred, the report is dismissed.
Educational Opportunity: An email will be sent to the Respondent requesting a non-mandatory meeting to meet and discuss the issue and remind the student of their responsibility as a UHWO student. If the Respondent declines or does not respond, an email will be sent outlining the reporter’s issue and request.
Merit: If there is sufficient information that a policy violation may have occurred. The case will move forward to a formal process. The Respondent is sent a notification of the potential violation(s) and a summary of the incident The Respondent can either schedule a meeting or submit a written statement for review.
Notification of Alleged Violation:
Student Conduct Meeting:
Responds: The Respondent responds to the notification & schedules a meeting. The Complainant and the Respondent are sent a notification of the scheduled meeting. If the Respondent does not respond or schedule a meeting within 5 working days of the notification a hold will be placed on their account and the SCO may proceed with a determination of responsibility based on the information available at the time.
Identification: The Respondent submits a photo identification prior to or brings it to the SCO meeting to verify & ensure the right student attends the meeting. If no identification, the meeting may be rescheduled.
Meeting: The Respondent & the SCO discuss the allegation(s) to provided the Respondent with an opportunity to tell their side of the story, as well as provide documents and/or witness(es), if any.
Decision: The SCO reviews all of the available information provided from the Respondent’s written statement, the report, and all the meetings with the Complainant, the Respondent, and witness(es), if any, to determines whether “more likely than not” a policy violation occurred based on all the information provided.
Letter of Responsibility: The Respondent & the Complainant are sent a letter of the SCO’s decision which includes a rationale for the decision on Responsibility, the charges, and sanction(s) imposed along with instruction on how to appeal, if they choose. If found not responsible, the case is dismissed.
Submission of Written Statement:
Responds: The Respondent responds to the notification & submits a written statement of their account of the alleged incident along with documents or names of witness(es), if any. If the Respondent does not respond or submits a written statement within 5 working days of the notification a hold will be placed on their account and the SCO may proceed with a determination of responsibility based on the information available at the time.
Review: The SCO reviews all of the available information provided from the Respondent’s written statement, the report, and all the meetings with the Complainant, the Respondent, and witness(es), if any. The SCO will follow up with either questions or render a determination on responsibility based on all available information.
Meeting: If the Respondent provided witness(es), the SCO will schedule a meeting with the witness(es) to gather information. The SCO may follow up with further questions, if any to the Respondent.
Decision: After reviewing all the relevant information the SCO determines whether “more likely than not” a policy violation occurred based on all the information.
Letter of Responsibility: The Respondent & the Complainant are sent a letter of the SCO’s decision which includes a rationale for the decision on Responsibility, the charges, and sanction(s) imposed along with instruction on how to appeal, if chooses. If found not responsible, the case is dismissed.
Determination on Responsibility:
Determination: The SCO renders a determination based on whether “more likely than not” there is sufficient or insufficient information that a violation occurred. Preponderance of the evidence is used.
Not Responsible: The SCO determines there is insufficient information a policy violation occurred based on all the information provided by both parties. The Respondent is found not responsible for a policy violation and the case is dismissed.
Responsible: The SCO determines there is sufficient information a policy violation occurred based on all of the information provided by both parties. The Respondent is formally charged and sanction(s) imposed. If the Respondent does not complete the sanction by the deadline given, a hold will be placed on student’s account.
Further the Fact Finding: The SCO determines additional information is needed before making a determination on responsibility. The SCO will interview additional witness(es) and/or review additional documents, if any. The SCO will render a determination on responsibility whether “more likely than not” a policy violation occurred.
Letter of Responsibility: The Respondent & the Complainant are sent a letter of the SCO’s decision which includes a rationale for the decision on Responsibility, the charges, and sanction(s) imposed along with instruction on how to appeal, if they choose. If found not responsible, the case is dismissed.
Possible Sanctions
Written Notice: A notice in writing to the student that the student is violating or has violated institutional regulations and a copy of the warning letter is placed in the student’s disciplinary file.
Probation: Probation is for a designated period of time (which may include the remainder of their enrollment at UH West O’ahu) and includes the probability of more severe disciplinary sanctions if the student is found to violate any institutional regulation(s) during the probationary period. This sanction may require the student to meet with the VCSA (or his or her designee) upon request.
Loss of Privileges: Denial of specified privileges for a designated period of time.
Restitution: Compensation for loss, damage, or injury. This may take the form of appropriate service and/or monetary or material replacement.
Discretionary Sanction: Work assignments, essays, service to UH West O’ahu, Community Service, or other related discretionary or educational related assignments. Examples are Quiz of the Student Code of Conduct, Apology letter, Responsibility Letter, Educational Essay or project, Community Services.
f. Mutual No-Contact Order: No unnecessary contact between the Respondent and the Complainant, witnesses, or other individuals (when appropriate).
g. Suspension: Separation of the student from UH West O`ahu for a definite period of time (usually 1 year or less) after which the student is eligible to return. Conditions for readmission may be specified. Suspensions may be effective immediately or deferred.
h. Dismissal: Separation of the student from UH West O`ahu for more than 1 year. The student may be eligible for return. Conditions for readmission, if any, will be specified. Dismissals will be effective immediately unless otherwise stated.
i. Expulsion: Separation of the student from UH West O`ahu permanently. Expulsions will be effective immediately, unless otherwise stated.
j. Revocation of Admission/Degree: Admission to or a degree awarded from UH West Oahu may be revoked for fraud, misrepresentation, or other violation of UH West O`ahu standards in obtaining the degree, or for other serious violations committed by a student prior to graduation.
UH West O’ahu imposes discipline that is consistent with the impact of the offense on the UH West O’ahu community. Progressive discipline principles will be followed in that the student’s prior disciplinary history at UH West O’ahu (and any other institution of higher education, if applicable) will be taken into account.
A guide to Applying for Academic Accomodations.
- Complete the intake form & submit supporting documents. https://bit.ly/uhwoada
- Disability Coordinator will send you a confirmation of receipt email and next steps.
- Meet with Disability Coordinator
- Approved accommodations will be sent to your professor(s).
- Student is responsible for also making arrangements with Professor(s) to discuss accomodations.
Appeal Process
Appeal Submitted: The VCSA will either assigns an Appellate Officer or shall serve as the Appellate Officer.
A copy of the appeal given to the non-appealing party to respond and provide information. The SCO will provide information including the incident report to the Appellate Officer.
Decision: The Appellate Officer shall consider the basis for the appeal and make a determination on the issue presented that fairly addresses the alleged appeal issue ONLY.
Four Basis to Appeal:
1. A material deviation from the procedure that substantially jeopardized the fairness of the process
2. New information that was unknown or unavailable at the time would have resulted in a substantially different outcome.
3. A demonstrable bias by the SCO (only if the meeting is recorded).
4. The sanction was substantially disproportionate to the severity of the violation.
No Review/Appeal Denied: If the appeal does not warrant a further review based on the 4 reason to appeal, the appeal is denied. The case is closed and the decision of the Appellate Officer shall be FINAL and BINDING.
Both the Complainant and the Respondent are notified via email regarding the appeal and the reason for the denial.
Review/Appeal Granted: If the appeal warrants a further review based on the 4 basis to appeal, the appeal is granted.
The Appellate Officer will either:
1. assign another SCO & re-notice the Respondent. The whole grievance process starts over.
2. consider the new information & make a final determination of responsibility and/or impose sanction(s).
3. have another SCO reviews the information & make a determination on responsibility and/or impose sanction(s).
4. issue appropriate sanction(s) that are proportionate to the severity of the violation.
The decision of the Appellate Officer (or the SCO assigned by the Appellate Officer for an appellate purpose) under any circumstances listed above, shall be final and binding upon all involved parties.
A guide to Applying for Academic Accomodations.
- Complete the intake form & submit supporting documents. https://bit.ly/uhwoada
- Disability Coordinator will send you a confirmation of receipt email and next steps.
- Meet with Disability Coordinator
- Approved accommodations will be sent to your professor(s).
- Student is responsible for also making arrangements with Professor(s) to discuss accomodations.